Leaves hair too greasy

I have thick hair but I found this product to leave a strong residue that made my hair greasy. I love the smell but unfortunately this is just a wasn’t for me.

Love the smell

I loved the smell of this shampoo! Although it didn't really make my hair softer my hair still feels dry. I loved the smell and made hair look a bit shinier without it feeling oily.

I often buy stuff that has coconut scents,. It's my fave scent, so i bought this shampoo (and conditioner). I ended up pouring to down the drain. Sorry Garnier, but the chemical smell in this was so strong it made my eyes water and burned my scalp. I couldnt smell any coconut in it. It was awful.

This shampoo is ... Average. The smell is coconut-ty but more perfumey than actual coconut scented. It cleans okay but I'm just not overly impressed. I won't buy it again.

Like the other shamposs in this line of Garnier Whole Blends Shampoo, the effect was great on my hair in comparison to other brands: my hair was silky soft. However, I didn't like the scent. It felt unfresh on my hair.

I have used better products but I have also used worse - this is just average to me. The entire line of Whole Blends smells fantastic, I decided to go with this one because I felt it smelt the best. The scent lingers on my hair and I do catch whiffs throughout the day, which is really nice. It feels nice distributing to my hair and lathered nicely, didn't cause my scalp any irritations. Hair just seemed blah, no softer or shinier than normal. Hair did seem easier to brush after my shower though with minimal tangles.
I used the Coconut Oil and Cocoa Butter Shampoo, Conditioner and afterwards, I applied the dry oil. These products do not work well in humidity, I never experience frizz or unruly hair in the heat with my usual products. My hair was a complete mess just a few hours after styling and being outside, I was very unimpressed. These products might be fine in the winter or when it is colder but not for heat and humidity, I wouldn't purchase again even if they were inexpensive.