on Dec 17, 2010 @ 10:07 am|
Gwyneth looks so classy in a virginal Pucci gown... and then she turns to the side and then - Hello!
I love this gown, but am vaguely annoyed that she's going commando (or so it would certainly seem). Do you think this is tasteful, or is this taking things too far - at least for Gwyneth?
I'd expect this from Lady Gaga or one of the starlets who believes undies is optional. Sex sells!
Ali de Bold
|It's not that racey on Dec 17, 2010 @ 10:44 am|
But anything without undies is gross to me.
|agree on Dec 17, 2010 @ 11:02 am|
Yes, that's what I love about this dress is that it's not racey. But the bare butt thing just isn't doing it for me...
|Stop at Hip on Dec 17, 2010 @ 11:13 am|
I think it'd look a lot better and classier if the slit stopped at about the hip area, so undies would still be an option!
|not who its meant for ... on Dec 17, 2010 @ 11:18 am|
I don't think the dress is meant to do it for you, per se, mamaluv! ;-) But perhaps for men or lesbians ... as you mentioned, sex sells!
I like the dress. Its elegant and seductive. Would I wear it? No.
|Not a fan of this dress on Dec 17, 2010 @ 01:17 pm|
I think Gwyneth is stunning and I usually worship her style but I think the front of this dress is a bore and the slit at the side looks cheap to me.
|Katie Cassidy following "suit" on Dec 20, 2010 @ 11:59 am|
|but I like this one on Dec 22, 2010 @ 10:56 am|
Katie Cassidy's dress has some pizzazz to it - it's fabulous!
Gwyneth's would have looked good in this one too
|Princess Leia? on Dec 22, 2010 @ 11:03 am|
I don't know...from the front, Gwyneth's dress reminds me of princess leia's dress!
|I like.... on Dec 22, 2010 @ 11:21 am|
Katie Cassidy's dress MUCH better than Gwyneth's. The lace adds a touch of class to a pretty revealing dress. I completely agree with Cathy, Gwyneth's dress looks rather 'cheap.'