Cover Girl Battle: Dakota '50 Shades' Johnson vs. Miley 'No Brows' Cyrus vs. Kristen 'No Smile' Stewart + Comment to Win!
This week, there were three magazine covers that caught my eye, each for different reasons. Dakota Johnson graced Elle and yeah, I know what you're thinking - who? While Miley bared all, like ALL for W and lastly, Kristen Stewart scowled on Marie Claire. Obviously, we need to discuss this.
We broke each cover down for it's pros and cons and we need your input. Let us know which cover you love/hate/love to hate and why. When you do, you'll be entered to win a prize pack worth C$35.00! Sweet!
Dakota Johnson
Not recognizing this name? Dakota may not be a household name… yet. She's snagged the part of Anastasia Steele in the upcoming and much anticipated film adaptation of 50 Shades of Grey. For an actress not well known, this cover is a major get. I'm impressed with her natural look in front of the camera. As far as the clothing goes, I'm not sure if I like it. Is it just me or does it make her look a little childish? I get the whole 'innocent' thing she's going for - especially if she's playing Anastasia - but I think I would have preferred a more mature, sexy look.
(images via tomanadlorenzo.com)
Miley Cyrus
Miley 'No Brows' returns! We first broke the news about her leaked cover a little while ago and we just couldn't get past the missing brows. This editorial spread is RAUNCHY and still, we can't stop focusing on what's above her eyes, or well, what's not. Miley does seem to really be coming into her own as far as modelling goes. She's managed to make this look edgy. Still, I think we've seen enough of Miley's body lately. Put the nips away, Miles.
(images via tomandlorenzo.com)
Kristen Stewart
Okay, first things first: the cover. Why the expression, K Stew? Has someone farted in your vicinity? Why are you so unhappy? I'm not totally in love with the clothing choices here. They seem pretty obvious to me. I want to be drawn to something unexpected not the same 'ol unhappy Stewart looking uncomfortable in unflattering couture.
(images via tomandlorenzo.com, hawtcelebs.com)
Which of these covers is your favourite/least favourite?
Facebook Comments
48 Comments
 | Dakota for sure. Miley just needs to disappear already, I've seen enough of her. And Kristen only has one facial expression. Ever. |
 | I am not a fan of Miley Cyrus but I think the photos are edgy and buzz worthy. She's always finding new ways of bringing shock value to her image so I think hers are the best. |
 | I like Dakota pic she look amazing classic n sassy |
 | I like Dakota's pic :) |
 | Miley looks like an alien without the brows and Kristen looks like they took these on any average day while she was out and scowling so, by default I will vote for Dakota. |
 | I don't mind all of the covers really. Miley doesn't look like herself though, Kristen stewarts is pretty generic and Dakota Johnsons is who I would pick, classy yet sexy. Mileys is so trashy! |
 | I like Dakota's pics, she looks good but managed to keep it classy. Kristen's are what I've come to expect from her, no smiling and acting like she'd rather be anyway else besides posing. I don't like Miley's at all, she looks trashy and the nip slip is really unappealing. |
 | Dakota's pictures are my favorite. |
 | Miley's cover may be a bit raunchy but could you imagine it any other way? Magazines are supposed to make people want to buy them and seeing a cover like that on a stand will make anyone turn their head and think "I got to see what that's about" and that's what they're supposed to do. So personally I love Miley's the best. |
 | I love Dakotas cover, it's good to see a fresh new face on a magazine. It will make people want to go out and buy the magazine to find out who she is. Love it! |
Add Comment:
Related Articles
Previous Articles
